ABSTRACT
Background. Cancer patients (CPs) with COVID-19 have an increased risk of adverse outcomes. In addition, CPs seem to have a lower immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This study aimed to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (anti-S Abs) following COVID-19 vaccination in CPs and healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods. We conducted a point-seroprevalence study in CPs and HCWs who received a two-dose scheme with either BNT162b2, AZD1222, or Sputnik-V vaccine. We measured anti-S Abs by quantitative immunoassay to assess humoral immune response. Besides, we quantified anti-nucleocapsid antibodies in a subgroup of individuals to determine prior infection. We compared anti-S Abs titers in both groups and stratified by vaccine type, prior infection, and clinical characteristics. We conducted a multivariate logistic regression to determine variables associated with a poor humoral response. Results. Six hundred forty-one individuals were included: 174 (27%) CPs and 467 (73%) HCWs. The median anti-S Abs titter was higher among HCWs compared to CPs (2568 U/mL vs. 1807 U/mL, p=0.002). Both CPs and HCWs with prior infection had higher anti-S Abs titter (p< 0.001). Regardless of the time since vaccination, a higher proportion of subjects with titers < 250 U/mL was observed in CPs (p< 0.001) (Fig 2). In the multivariate analysis, older age (p=0.036), AZD1222 (p=0.003), and Sputnik-V (p=0.020) were associated with lower humoral response among the entire cohort. SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers among cancer patients and healthcare workers. Global differences in anti-S Abs titers between CPs and HCWs groups (a) and antibody titers in CPs and HCWs groups stratified by type of received vaccine (b). Abbreviations: CP: Cancer patients, HCW: Healthcare workers. SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers according to time since vaccination among cancer patients and healthcare workers. Abbreviations: CP: Cancer patients, HCW: Healthcare workers. Conclusion. In this study, both CPs and HCWs showed an adequate response to vaccination;however, CPs had lower anti-S Abs titers and a faster decline over time. Based on our results, new strategies should be assessed to sustain the humoral response to vaccination and thus decrease the COVID-19 burden among the oncologic population.
ABSTRACT
Current medical guidelines consider pregnant women with COVID-19 to be a high-risk group. Since physiological gestation downregulates the immunological response to maintain "maternal-fetal tolerance", SARS-CoV-2 infection may constitute a potentially threatening condition to both the mother and the fetus. To establish the immune profile in pregnant COVID-19+ patients, a cross-sectional study was conducted. Pregnant women with COVID-19 (P-COVID-19+; n = 15) were analyzed and compared with nonpregnant women with COVID-19 (NP-COVID-19+; n = 15) or those with physiological pregnancy (P-COVID-19-; n = 13). Serological cytokine and chemokine concentrations, leucocyte immunophenotypes, and mononuclear leucocyte responses to polyclonal stimuli were analyzed in all groups. Higher concentrations of serological TNF-α, IL-6, MIP1b and IL-4 were observed within the P-COVID-19+ group, while cytokines and chemokines secreted by peripheral leucocytes in response to LPS, IL-6 or PMA-ionomicin were similar among the groups. Immunophenotype analysis showed a lower percentage of HLA-DR+ monocytes in P-COVID-19+ than in P-COVID-19- and a higher percentage of CD39+ monocytes in P-COVID-19+ than in NP-COVID-19+. After whole blood polyclonal stimulation, similar percentages of T cells and TNF+ monocytes between groups were observed. Our results suggest that P-COVID-19+ elicits a strong inflammatory response similar to NP-COVID19+ but also displays an anti-inflammatory response that controls the ATP/adenosine balance and prevents hyperinflammatory damage in COVID-19.